![]() However, it puts some additional work on your teams, sometimes causing a decrease in productivity. Kubernetes, on the other hand, is a lower-level abstraction that can serve as a base for building your customized deployment platform, providing you with greater flexibility. It is a great choice for new, cloud-native apps and smaller teams working in short lifecycles and frequent releases. To summarize all of the above, Cloud Foundry works on a high-level of abstraction, offering a higher level of productivity to its users, especially for application developers, but that comes with some limitations concerning customization in the runtime. ![]() The next important difference is that while Kubernetes might be burdensome to run on your infrastructure, Cloud Foundry is made to host workloads on any equipment, whether it’s on-premise, a public cloud, a bunch of plain VMs! Also, it allows the operators to transfers the workloads between all the possible options in a matter of minutes, with no need to change the app whatsoever. So from a developer perspective, connecting the application to a new database instance consist of just two simple commands – one to provision a database service instance, second to bind the service to the app instance.Īlso, all brokers installed on the platform are available from the “marketplace” which is a central place where the operator or developer can find a specific service, check available plans, and quickly provision a service instance. The broker takes care of setting up the connection using the application environment – that allows, for example, a Java Spring application to automatically pick up the database connection details and use that as the main app data source. ![]() Cloud native java versus cloud foundry the definitive guide software#It uses the concept of “service brokers” to allow any operator (including a software developer) to provision an instance of the service and bind it to any application without the need to manually provide the service details to it. Effortless Services Available on the MarketplaceĬloud Foundry abstraction also covers what’s called the “services”, which is a concept missing in Kubernetes.ĬF Services are specific on-demand applications, such as relational and non-relational databases, message brokers, caching solutions, etc. In other words, Kubernetes hides nothing from the developers, making developers and operators interact with it in the same way, while Cloud Foundry provides a different experience for cloud operators and cloud developers, simplifying the interface offered to the latter. How does it compare to Kubernetes? Because Kubernetes’ main unit of currency is the container, it puts additional complexity on developers’ work, making them build the container for the app and provide other deployment configurations, while Cloud Foundry frees them from doing that. That’s why Cloud Foundry says that the main unit of currency for the platform is the application. That allows the developer to focus only on the application code. It understands the application dependencies, builds the container, deploys it, scales it, connects it to the network, and routes the traffic to it. As the platform creators say: you give it the application, and it does the rest. Cloud Foundry vs Kubernetes: Similarities and DifferencesĪs Cloud Foundry Foundation says, “Cloud Foundry is a dollhouse, and Kubernetes is a box of building blocks from which you can create a dollhouse”.Ĭloud Foundry shares features with Kubernetes but is a higher-level abstraction of cloud-native application deployment. Widely used Kubernetes is a system using ideas from both IaaS and PaaS while focusing mainly on containers orchestration.īut what if you don’t want to use Kubernetes for some reason? In that case, the Cloud Foundry project is the way to go. That obviously comes with a cost of flexibility, making advanced customization of your app instances a little harder than on the IaaS-based platform. Leaving the infrastructure management to the platform, they can simply focus on delivering business value for your product. That allows the developer to simply “push” the application for deployment and let our cloud take care of the rest. As you can see in the table, the PaaS solution creates the highest level of abstraction, taking most of the management work away from your team and puts it on the platform itself.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |